How to Arrive at ‐1 and 1 from Spaces or Zeroes
Investigate the steps of the Theory of Neutral Operations as they apply to spaces or zeroes arriving at negative and positive 1, from the point of view of an early Universe trying to create something from nothing (purely logically)., Let there be at...
Step-by-Step Guide
-
Step 1: Investigate the steps of the Theory of Neutral Operations as they apply to spaces or zeroes arriving at negative and positive 1
Do so by going to the Desktop and selecting the green X (for XL), starting the app, and then select File Open New Workbook.
Take notes of the Conditions and Formulas below onto the workbook worksheet and save the file into a logical folder. -
Step 2: from the point of view of an early Universe trying to create something from nothing (purely logically).
they are exactly empty space or space-time, without energy, differentiable only by imagined size.
To restate: in this primordial reality or existence, the zero symbol, 0, is less than than the capital O symbol and both are greater than the small o symbol., Let a multiplicity of these be noticed also, i.e.
O*o =
0.
What is noticed is that space may be proportioned into parts, and brought again together into wholes.
You may also think about O*o as if they were each squares and the smaller square was unit inches or square inches; in that case, multiplying the larger square (space) by the smaller one (an abstract unit) would result in the larger space being measurable in terms of abstract inches, all of which are zeroes, not things.
When we say 'One foot = 12"
we do not need a ruler or a thing to have a good idea of what is meant in terms of space.
The space still equals zero since nothing occupies it yet.
It's just an abstract "overlay" of a sort., Let it suffice that Truth = Comprehension, such that if a state is True, it is Comprehended by the Bounds of Reality since certainly human comprehension exists within the Bounds of Reality at least, and perhaps Universal Mind does as well.
Therefore, if it is more proper to say "space-time" instead of "space"
then that is what is meant by each symbol, including (one supposes) the operators, equality and inequalities.
In other words, everything is being accomplished by pure logic and the only "matter" involved is empty space-time.
That sort of abstraction connotes that logic is a property of space or space-time itself, or perhaps a property of different sorts of space or space-time
-- just as air is different than outer space and the space around a neutron star is different than the space around other types of stars.
Yes, those conditions require matter while instead a matter-less reality for the beginning of the Universe is supposed, but differences in the quality of matter may arise from differences in the quality of sub-space, e.g. in spin operators even where no particles are spinning, only where waves of space are somehow differentiable, if only by size.
Because all the theory actually depends upon is O>o and O+o=0=O*o.
That is to say, a difference in size existed in the Primary Universe, and that this difference had a Cause.
What that Cause was matters less than the Logic it gives rise to for this case under consideration., Proceed as before with a and b, and when arriving at division, mean it geometrically, i.e. proportionally, i.e. a/b = a:b as a simple proportion, rather than as a mathematical operation that is performed.
That is, the great space is greater in proportion to the smaller space, rather then physically divided by it (though that is possible as well, as in the ruler example).,, The raw logic of this may have taken eons or billions of eons, but time is on our side when attempting to create something as tremendous as a Universe.
Carl Sagan once said that proving 1, or the Identity Principle, takes 28 steps in logic.
Those 28 or so steps are being assumed., Then, both sides were divided by the parenthetical term in order to isolate a single term.
Now, isolate
-1.
O/o = O:o, i.e. the greater space is in proportional relation to the lesser space.,, There now exists in the Universe 1, 1 thing, 1 unit, a counted thing in the Universe, and its antithesis,
-1 as well from the previous step.
Both require the "know how" to do O/o = O:o, i.e. hold two spaces of different size in ratio to one another
-- that's the key.
Let's suppose the larger O = 3 and the smaller o =
2. 3 > 3:2 and 3 > 3/2.
Here what we have supposed is that the smaller space is 1/2 as large as the larger space.
If we look at the final step, we have 3
- 3/2, which = 3/2, so it would not be true that 0>O, unless 0 is the very concept of "zero-ness"
and includes all zeroes.
It, strangely enough, also equals the Null Set, which is the absence of anything, even zeroes I believe.
Thus, it is All and it is Nothing.
It comprehends everything and exists nowhere in particular
-- not even in empty Space-Time.
It is the greatest and the least of all things ... being both Everything and Nothing, simultaneously.
Conclude then, that it is beyond comprehension, yet contains comprehension, and thus all perception and reason, including this possible theory for the formation of its existence. -
Step 3: Let there be at least 3 spaces (or zeroes)
-
Step 4: such that O>0>o and all are unequal or equal to the Null Set
-
Step 5: Notice that sometimes O+o = 0
-
Step 6: that is when two spaces sum to make a third space.
-
Step 7: Regard that stating "what is noticed" sounds like one is talking about an Awareness in the Primordial Universe.
-
Step 8: Now do the Neutral Operation O+o = O*o = 0.
-
Step 9: Do O+o-o = (O*o)-o by subtracting o from both sides of the equation.
-
Step 10: Do O = o*(O-1)... an admittedly great step for the Universe to take
-
Step 11: to factor out o on the right after simplifying the left
-
Step 12: but Nature has a way of trying all possibilities
-
Step 13: so consider it at least a possibility.
-
Step 14: Do O:o = O/o = (O-1) .... now here is taken a step not taken with a and b.
-
Step 15: Do O:o - O = O/o - O = -1 and negative 1 has been isolated and defined.
-
Step 16: Do O - O:o = O - O/o = +1 after multiplying through by negative 1
-
Step 17: and the result is positive 1 has been isolated and defined.
Detailed Guide
Do so by going to the Desktop and selecting the green X (for XL), starting the app, and then select File Open New Workbook.
Take notes of the Conditions and Formulas below onto the workbook worksheet and save the file into a logical folder.
they are exactly empty space or space-time, without energy, differentiable only by imagined size.
To restate: in this primordial reality or existence, the zero symbol, 0, is less than than the capital O symbol and both are greater than the small o symbol., Let a multiplicity of these be noticed also, i.e.
O*o =
0.
What is noticed is that space may be proportioned into parts, and brought again together into wholes.
You may also think about O*o as if they were each squares and the smaller square was unit inches or square inches; in that case, multiplying the larger square (space) by the smaller one (an abstract unit) would result in the larger space being measurable in terms of abstract inches, all of which are zeroes, not things.
When we say 'One foot = 12"
we do not need a ruler or a thing to have a good idea of what is meant in terms of space.
The space still equals zero since nothing occupies it yet.
It's just an abstract "overlay" of a sort., Let it suffice that Truth = Comprehension, such that if a state is True, it is Comprehended by the Bounds of Reality since certainly human comprehension exists within the Bounds of Reality at least, and perhaps Universal Mind does as well.
Therefore, if it is more proper to say "space-time" instead of "space"
then that is what is meant by each symbol, including (one supposes) the operators, equality and inequalities.
In other words, everything is being accomplished by pure logic and the only "matter" involved is empty space-time.
That sort of abstraction connotes that logic is a property of space or space-time itself, or perhaps a property of different sorts of space or space-time
-- just as air is different than outer space and the space around a neutron star is different than the space around other types of stars.
Yes, those conditions require matter while instead a matter-less reality for the beginning of the Universe is supposed, but differences in the quality of matter may arise from differences in the quality of sub-space, e.g. in spin operators even where no particles are spinning, only where waves of space are somehow differentiable, if only by size.
Because all the theory actually depends upon is O>o and O+o=0=O*o.
That is to say, a difference in size existed in the Primary Universe, and that this difference had a Cause.
What that Cause was matters less than the Logic it gives rise to for this case under consideration., Proceed as before with a and b, and when arriving at division, mean it geometrically, i.e. proportionally, i.e. a/b = a:b as a simple proportion, rather than as a mathematical operation that is performed.
That is, the great space is greater in proportion to the smaller space, rather then physically divided by it (though that is possible as well, as in the ruler example).,, The raw logic of this may have taken eons or billions of eons, but time is on our side when attempting to create something as tremendous as a Universe.
Carl Sagan once said that proving 1, or the Identity Principle, takes 28 steps in logic.
Those 28 or so steps are being assumed., Then, both sides were divided by the parenthetical term in order to isolate a single term.
Now, isolate
-1.
O/o = O:o, i.e. the greater space is in proportional relation to the lesser space.,, There now exists in the Universe 1, 1 thing, 1 unit, a counted thing in the Universe, and its antithesis,
-1 as well from the previous step.
Both require the "know how" to do O/o = O:o, i.e. hold two spaces of different size in ratio to one another
-- that's the key.
Let's suppose the larger O = 3 and the smaller o =
2. 3 > 3:2 and 3 > 3/2.
Here what we have supposed is that the smaller space is 1/2 as large as the larger space.
If we look at the final step, we have 3
- 3/2, which = 3/2, so it would not be true that 0>O, unless 0 is the very concept of "zero-ness"
and includes all zeroes.
It, strangely enough, also equals the Null Set, which is the absence of anything, even zeroes I believe.
Thus, it is All and it is Nothing.
It comprehends everything and exists nowhere in particular
-- not even in empty Space-Time.
It is the greatest and the least of all things ... being both Everything and Nothing, simultaneously.
Conclude then, that it is beyond comprehension, yet contains comprehension, and thus all perception and reason, including this possible theory for the formation of its existence.
About the Author
Joshua Henderson
A passionate writer with expertise in DIY projects topics. Loves sharing practical knowledge.
Rate This Guide
How helpful was this guide? Click to rate: